A voice keyboard that keeps your voice on your phone.
Install Yaps on Android for offline dictation, a familiar full-size keyboard, and no screen capture. Scan the QR on desktop, or tap the Play badge on mobile.
SuperWhisper does speech-to-text well, but it is not the only on-device option, and it is not the right shape for every workflow. Here are the seven best SuperWhisper alternatives in 2026, ranked by privacy, scope, and value.

SuperWhisper has earned a solid reputation as a speech-to-text tool for Mac. It runs Whisper models locally, gives you accurate transcription without a cloud dependency, and does the one thing it promises to do - turn your voice into text.
If that is all you need, SuperWhisper is a reasonable choice. Full stop.
But if you have been using SuperWhisper and find yourself wishing it did more - or if you are evaluating dictation tools and want to understand the full landscape - this comparison is for you. We built Yaps, so we are obviously biased. But we also believe the best way to earn trust is to be honest about where each tool excels and where it falls short.
A note on the most common refinements of this query before we get into the comparison.
SuperWhisper Windows alternative. SuperWhisper is Mac-only. There is no SuperWhisper for Windows and no announced plan for one. If you searched here from a Windows machine, the closest equivalents are the local-Whisper apps we cover in best dictation software for Windows.
SuperWhisper Android. SuperWhisper does not have an Android app. If you wanted SuperWhisper-on-mobile, the live, on-device, voice-keyboard equivalent on Android is what we built Yaps Android to be. Our Wispr Flow alternative for Android write-up covers the field.
SuperWhisper free alternative. Yaps has a free tier. Apple Dictation is free. MacWhisper has a free model. The OpenAI Whisper command-line tool is free if you are comfortable with a terminal. We walk through Whisper local setup on Mac for readers who want the open-source path.
SuperWhisper open-source equivalent. SuperWhisper itself is closed-source. The model it runs (Whisper) is open-source, and various community frontends exist - Whispering, nerd-dictation, and the Whisper.cpp ecosystem. None match SuperWhisper's polish, but the underlying capability is fully open.
Speech-to-text
Solid on-device speech-to-text for Mac. Focused on that one feature. No text-to-speech, no voice notes library, no studio editor, no voice commands.
Voice workflow
Speech-to-text plus text-to-speech, voice notes, a studio editor, voice commands, and searchable history. One app, one local install, one spoken workflow.
Here is the shortlist, ranked for most users. Deeper write-ups below.
On-device voice toolkit for macOS that goes well beyond dictation: speech-to-text, TTS with 18+ voices, voice notes, a studio editor with WAV/SRT export, voice commands, and searchable history. Free tier; Pro from $15/mo. Apple Silicon required. Android shipping, Windows in development. Best for: a complete on-device voice workflow, not just transcription.
The veteran of Whisper-on-Mac. Excellent at batch transcription of recorded audio (interviews, lectures, podcasts), with strong model selection and reasonable pricing. Best for: researchers and podcasters with stacks of audio. Trade-off: less polished for live, system-wide dictation.
A fully open-source Whisper frontend for Mac. Free, transparent, audit-friendly. Best for: developers and privacy maximalists who want to read the code that processes their voice. Trade-off: rougher UX and fewer convenience features than commercial tools.
Cloud-based dictation with strong AI reformatting that rewrites raw speech into polished prose. Best for: users who prioritise reformatting quality and do not mind sending audio to the cloud. Trade-off: every dictation leaves your device; subscription-only; the March 2026 SOC 2 audit episode is worth reading about in our Wispr Flow vs SuperWhisper privacy comparison.
Built into macOS, free, mostly on-device on Apple Silicon. Best for: zero cost, zero install. Trade-off: session length caps, weaker technical-vocabulary accuracy, no TTS / notes / studio.
The original open-source Whisper, run from your terminal. Best for: developers who want full control over model size, batching, and scripting. Trade-off: terminal-only, requires Python setup, no live dictation UX. Our Whisper local Mac setup guide walks through the install.
Two community projects that wrap Whisper in a global-hotkey dictation flow. Best for: SuperWhisper's "press hotkey, speak, get text" shape without paying for a closed-source app. Trade-off: documentation gaps and rougher polish.
We weighted (1) privacy by architecture, not by promise; (2) scope beyond just transcription; (3) sustainable pricing without subscription lock-in; (4) Apple Silicon support. We built Yaps and disclosed it. Where another tool genuinely wins for a specific use case, we say so.
Three quick clarifications on the most common refinements of this query.
SuperWhisper Windows alternative. SuperWhisper is Mac-only. For Windows, see best dictation software for Windows.
SuperWhisper Android. SuperWhisper has no Android app. For the on-device voice keyboard shape on mobile, see our Wispr Flow alternative for Android write-up.
How do I uninstall SuperWhisper? Quit the app, drag SuperWhisper.app to the Trash, then in Terminal run rm -rf ~/Library/Caches/com.superduper.superwhisper-setapp and rm -rf ~/Library/Application\ Support/superwhisper. Empty the Trash. (Setapp installs uninstall from the Setapp menu.)
Credit where it is due. SuperWhisper has genuine strengths:
On-device processing. SuperWhisper runs Whisper models locally on your Mac, which means your audio stays on your machine. This is the right architectural choice for privacy, and it is one we share.
Model flexibility. SuperWhisper lets you choose between different Whisper model sizes - smaller models for speed, larger models for accuracy. If you want to tinker with the trade-offs, that control is available.
Straightforward pricing. SuperWhisper offers a one-time purchase option, which some users prefer to subscriptions.
Focused design. SuperWhisper does one thing - speech-to-text - and does it without clutter. If you value simplicity and only need dictation, that focus is appealing.
The core difference between SuperWhisper and Yaps is scope. SuperWhisper is a dictation tool. Yaps is a voice toolkit. For a full side-by-side breakdown, see our detailed SuperWhisper vs Yaps comparison.
Here is what that means in practice:
| Feature | SuperWhisper | Yaps |
|---|---|---|
| Speech-to-text | Yes | Yes |
| Text-to-speech | No | Yes (18+ voices) |
| Voice notes | No | Yes (with transcription) |
| Studio editor | No | Yes (WAV/SRT) |
| Voice commands | No | Yes |
| Smart history | No | Yes (searchable) |
| Offline voices | N/A | Yes (bundled) |
| macOS Shortcuts | No | Yes |
This is not a criticism of SuperWhisper - it was designed as a single-purpose tool. But the practical impact of these differences is significant for daily workflows.
SuperWhisper converts your voice to text. It does not go the other direction. If you want to hear a document read aloud for proofreading, review an email before sending, or listen to notes while walking, you need a separate tool.
Yaps includes text-to-speech with over 18 voice options - both offline voices bundled with the app and optional cloud voices (clearly labeled). Select text, press a hotkey, and hear it read in a natural voice. For writers, students, and anyone who reviews their own writing, this is not a nice-to-have. It is how you catch errors your eyes miss.
Practical example: You have just dictated a 500-word email to your team. Before hitting send, you highlight the text and press your TTS hotkey. As you listen, you catch a sentence that sounds awkward, a missing transition, and a detail you forgot. This review loop - dictate, listen, refine - is something you simply cannot do with a transcription-only tool. You would need to bring in a separate TTS app, copy the text over, configure voices, and manage two tools where one would do.
SuperWhisper handles live dictation - you speak, text appears at your cursor. But it does not have a voice notes feature for capturing and organizing thoughts.
Yaps voice notes let you press a hotkey and record a thought at any time. The recording is automatically transcribed, timestamped, and added to a searchable archive. Over time, this builds into a personal knowledge base of your spoken ideas. For more on why this matters, see our guide on voice notes as an idea capture tool.
Where this matters most: You are walking your dog and an idea hits you for a project you are working on. With SuperWhisper, you would need to open a text document, position your cursor, and dictate into it - which is awkward on the go. With Yaps, you press one hotkey, speak your thought, and it is captured, transcribed, and waiting for you when you sit down at your desk. Three months later, when you are looking for that idea, you can search your voice notes by keyword and find it instantly.
Yaps includes a studio for generating audio content - write or paste text, choose a voice, and generate audio with waveform visualization and word-level timings. Export as WAV with SRT subtitles. SuperWhisper does not offer anything in this space.
Practical scenario: You need a voiceover for a tutorial video. In the Yaps Studio, you paste your script, choose a natural voice, and generate the audio. Export the WAV file for your video editor and the SRT subtitles for captions - both generated from the same source text in one step. Without it, you are recording yourself, editing in Audacity, and generating subtitles separately.
SuperWhisper activates with a hotkey and transcribes. Yaps adds voice commands that let you control your Mac by speaking - trigger actions, switch apps, and automate tasks. Combined with macOS Shortcuts integration, this turns voice into a general-purpose control interface beyond just text input.
Example workflow: You are deep in a writing session and want to switch to your research notes, paste in a quote, and then open your browser to fact-check something. With keyboard and mouse, that is multiple app switches, key combos, and context interruptions. With Yaps voice commands, you speak what you want to happen and your hands stay on the keyboard for the actual writing. For developers, this extends to tasks like running build scripts, opening terminal tabs, or triggering deployment shortcuts - all by voice.
Every dictation, voice note, and TTS session in Yaps is saved to a searchable history. You can find what you said last week, re-use a paragraph from yesterday's dictation, or review your voice notes by keyword. SuperWhisper does not maintain this kind of persistent, searchable archive.
Why this adds up: In the first week, searchable history feels like a nice extra. After a month of regular use, it becomes indispensable. You start treating your dictation history the way you treat a notes app - searching for phrases, pulling up past drafts, finding that perfectly worded paragraph you dictated two weeks ago. This persistent memory of your voice work creates compounding value that a stateless dictation tool cannot match.
To move beyond feature checklists, here is how SuperWhisper and Yaps compare in specific daily scenarios:
With SuperWhisper, you dictate paragraphs into your word processor. The transcription is accurate. When you need to review what you wrote aloud, you switch to a separate TTS tool. When an idea strikes you during dinner, you have no quick capture mechanism unless you open your laptop, launch your editor, and dictate into a document.
With Yaps, you dictate into your word processor the same way. When you want to hear a section read aloud for flow and clarity, you highlight it and press a hotkey - same app, same workflow. When an idea strikes you at dinner, you press your voice notes hotkey, speak for 30 seconds, and find the transcribed note waiting in your searchable archive the next morning. The writing, reviewing, and capturing all happen in one tool.
A developer using SuperWhisper dictates code comments and documentation into their editor. It works. But when they want to review their API documentation aloud before publishing, when they want to capture a design decision during a walk, or when they want to use voice to trigger their build pipeline - those are all separate tools or manual processes.
With Yaps, the dictation works the same way. But the developer also reviews documentation with TTS, captures architecture decisions as voice notes during whiteboard sessions, and triggers macOS Shortcuts for common developer workflows by voice. For a deeper look at this use case, see our guide on voice input for developers.
A YouTuber or podcaster using SuperWhisper can dictate their script. That is the extent of the overlap. Script review, show notes, idea capture for future episodes, and workflow automation all require separate tools.
With Yaps, the same creator dictates their script, reviews it aloud with TTS to check pacing, captures episode ideas as timestamped voice notes throughout the week, edits and exports audio in the studio, and automates their publishing workflow with voice commands and Shortcuts. One app covers the entire voice layer of content production.
Both SuperWhisper and Yaps process speech-to-text on-device, which is the right foundation for privacy. Neither sends your audio to a cloud server for core dictation.
There are differences in the details:
SuperWhisper runs Whisper models locally. It does not appear to collect telemetry or require an account. The privacy posture for dictation is solid.
Yaps processes all core features on-device - dictation, text-to-speech, voice notes, voice commands, and smart history. No telemetry, no accounts required, no analytics SDKs. Cloud voices (optional, clearly labeled) send text - not audio - to TTS APIs. Your voice input is always processed locally.
Both tools pass the basic privacy test: disconnect from the internet and they still work. For a deeper look at why on-device processing matters so much for voice data specifically, see our article on what voice data actually reveals about you.
| SuperWhisper | Yaps | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Limited trial | Yes (5K words/week) |
| Paid plans | One-time purchase (~$30-50) | Basic $15/mo, Max $25/mo |
| Annual option | N/A | Yes (20% discount) |
SuperWhisper's one-time purchase model is appealing if you only need speech-to-text and want to avoid recurring charges. Yaps' subscription model reflects the broader feature set - you are paying for six tools (STT, TTS, voice notes, studio, commands, history) rather than one.
Yaps' free tier - 5,000 words per week with access to all features - lets you test the full experience before deciding. If basic dictation is all you need and you prefer a one-time payment, SuperWhisper's pricing model may be a better fit for your budget.
Choose SuperWhisper if:
Choose Yaps if:
The choice between SuperWhisper and Yaps comes down to a simple question: do you need a dictation tool, or do you need a voice toolkit? If dictation is genuinely all you use, SuperWhisper does that well. If you want voice to be a broader part of how you work - reading, capturing ideas, generating audio, automating tasks - Yaps bundles all of that into one app.
We want to be honest about this. There are specific situations where SuperWhisper is the better pick:
If you are a Whisper model enthusiast. SuperWhisper gives you granular control over which Whisper model you run - tiny, base, small, medium, large. If you want to experiment with different model sizes, compare accuracy at different compute costs, or you already have a preferred Whisper configuration from other projects, SuperWhisper gives you that technical control. Yaps uses its own models optimized for Apple Silicon and does not expose model-level configuration.
If you only need dictation and nothing else. Some people genuinely only need speech-to-text. They do not proofread aloud with TTS. They do not capture voice notes. They do not use voice commands. If that describes you, SuperWhisper does the one thing you need without the overhead of features you will never touch.
If you strongly prefer one-time purchases. Subscription fatigue is real. If you are actively pruning recurring charges from your life and a one-time payment is a hard requirement, SuperWhisper's pricing model wins by default. Yaps' subscription reflects its broader feature set, but that argument does not matter if your budget rule is "no more subscriptions."
If you use specialized vocabulary in a specific Whisper model. Some users have found that specific Whisper model sizes handle certain technical or domain-specific vocabulary better. If you have already dialed in a particular model configuration that works for your field, switching to a different speech engine means re-learning those quirks.
If you are currently using SuperWhisper and considering Yaps, the transition is straightforward. Yaps' free tier lets you run both tools side by side and compare them in your actual workflow. No commitment required.
Download Yaps from yaps.ai and install it. You do not need to uninstall SuperWhisper - both tools can run simultaneously. During your evaluation period, keep both active so you can compare them in real-time.
This is the most important step. Both tools use global hotkeys for activation. Make sure your Yaps dictation hotkey is different from your SuperWhisper hotkey so they do not fight for the same keyboard shortcut. A common approach: keep SuperWhisper on its existing hotkey and assign Yaps a new one, then gradually switch as you get comfortable.
SuperWhisper uses Whisper models; Yaps uses its own on-device models optimized for Apple Silicon's Neural Engine. The accuracy is comparable for standard dictation, though each may perform slightly differently on specialized vocabulary. Give yourself a few days to notice any differences in how each handles your particular speaking style, accent, and terminology.
The biggest adjustment is not replacing existing functionality - it is discovering new functionality. Set aside time to try:
A real evaluation takes time. Use both tools in your actual workflow for at least a week before making a decision. Pay attention to how often you reach for the features Yaps offers beyond dictation. If you never use TTS, voice notes, or commands after a week of trying, SuperWhisper may genuinely be the better fit. If those features start feeling natural, Yaps is earning its place.
Once you have decided, disable or uninstall the tool you are not keeping. If you stick with Yaps, reclaim the hotkey you were reserving for SuperWhisper and assign it to your preferred Yaps function.
Install Yaps on Android for offline dictation, a familiar full-size keyboard, and no screen capture. Scan the QR on desktop, or tap the Play badge on mobile.
It depends on what you need. SuperWhisper is better if you only want speech-to-text dictation and prefer a one-time purchase. It does that one job well with local Whisper models. Yaps is better if you want a complete voice toolkit - dictation plus text-to-speech, voice notes, a studio editor, voice commands, and searchable history. Neither is objectively better; they serve different needs.
Yes. SuperWhisper runs Whisper models locally on your Mac and does not require an internet connection for transcription. This is one of its genuine strengths and a philosophy it shares with Yaps. Both tools work fully offline for their core features.
SuperWhisper offers a limited trial, but it is primarily a paid tool with a one-time purchase model, typically in the $30-50 range. Yaps offers a free tier with 5,000 words per week and access to all features, so you can evaluate the full experience before paying anything.
Yes. There is no data migration needed since SuperWhisper does not maintain a persistent history in the same way Yaps does. Install Yaps, configure a different hotkey, and run both side by side during your evaluation. The main adjustment is getting familiar with Yaps' additional features beyond basic dictation. See the migration guide above for step-by-step instructions.
No. SuperWhisper lets you choose between different Whisper model sizes (tiny, base, small, medium, large). Yaps uses its own on-device models optimized specifically for Apple Silicon's Neural Engine rather than raw Whisper models. The transcription accuracy is comparable for everyday dictation, but you do not get the same model-level configuration that SuperWhisper offers.
Yaps has more to offer developers because it goes beyond dictation. Voice commands can trigger build scripts, deployment workflows, and terminal actions through macOS Shortcuts. Smart history lets you search past dictations for code snippets or documentation you spoke earlier. Voice notes capture design decisions during whiteboard sessions. SuperWhisper handles the dictation part well, but the surrounding developer workflow features are not there.
Yes. SuperWhisper processes all transcription locally on your Mac using Whisper models. Your audio does not leave your machine, which makes it appropriate for confidential dictation. Yaps shares the same local-first privacy architecture, so both tools are suitable for sensitive content.
SuperWhisper does not include text-to-speech - it is speech-to-text only. Yaps includes TTS with over 18 voices, both offline and optional cloud voices. If you need to hear your text read aloud for proofreading, accessibility, or review, this is a feature that only Yaps provides in this comparison.
Yaps uses under 200MB of RAM. SuperWhisper's memory usage varies depending on which Whisper model size you have loaded - larger models consume more memory. If you are running the large Whisper model, RAM usage can be significant. For Macs with 8GB of RAM where background memory matters, this is worth testing with your preferred configuration.
Yes, and this is a legitimate option. Some users run both - SuperWhisper for its Whisper model flexibility and Yaps for everything else (TTS, voice notes, voice commands, smart history). Just make sure their global hotkeys do not conflict. Over time, most users find that one tool covers enough of their needs, but running both is perfectly fine if each serves a distinct purpose in your workflow.
SuperWhisper is a good tool that does one thing well. We respect that. If one thing is all you need, it serves that purpose.
Yaps is a different kind of tool - one that treats voice as a complete workflow rather than a single function. Dictation is just the starting point. Text-to-speech, voice notes, a studio editor, voice commands, and smart history extend your voice into every part of your work.
The best way to decide is to try both. SuperWhisper has its pricing model; Yaps has a free tier. Use them in your actual daily work and let the experience guide your choice.